In the fourth book in the Anastasia series called 'Creation' we can read about the way our creator would have created us. Like in the biblical account we were created pure and loving, but we fell out of that state because of certain decisions we would have made back then. There is no word about the forbidden biblical trees, like the tree of knowledge of what is right and wrong and the tree of eternal life. The main reason for the fall in consciousness - according to Anastasia - would be our tendency to become too detailed.

Influenced by entities our forefathers represented by Adam and Eve would have adopted what Anastasia calls the 'dogma' which says that in order to create better than everything that is already created you need to dissect the current creation in every detail in order to discover the way everything works.

These entities would have envied the creator for his ability to create a physical world like Earth, and they didn't really understand how it was done. Since they wanted to discover that, they hoped that by planting the idea of investigating every detail of creation our forefathers would present the entities with the keys to creation.

Adam would have activated this desire to know every detail by breaking off a branch from a tree that bore a few fruits. This mere thought of wanting to study creation from within would have had detrimental effects.

For it would have halted the creative potential of humanity. Anastasia says that there is absolutely no need for humanity to know every tiny detail, for this knowledge is already encoded within us. This encoded knowledge simply manifests itself whenever a person, driven by the desire to activate his dreams.

Anastasia presents two examples to make this concept clearer. The first example is about a car: you don't really need to know the details of the engine in order to be able to drive the car. The second example is that when you meet a woman, there is no need to know the characteristics of every organ within her in order to love her and create together.

Anastasia claims that we have lost much of our spontaneous ability to create because of this 'endless unraveling' of everything. If we would only regain our focus on the act of creating and not bother too much with all the details, we would probably be able to rise in awareness. Since we already harbor this detailed knowledge within, we would do better by thinking bigger thoughts instead of killing off our creativity by studying every detail.

What to think of this theory? It sure makes sense that getting lost in details might kill our enthusiasm to create. Perhaps it is indeed better to focus on creating, instead of bothering about the details. On the other hand, with the loosh-perspective in mind,  there might be a reason why God doesn't want us to pay too much attention to all the details about creation, because there is something that God doesn't want us to know. Perhaps we are handing over 'loosh' or 'energy' in return for being created or am I am too paranoid here?

(See 'Anastasia: Schepping, pp 46-47 (Dutch Translation))
picture taken from Cardiff School District